SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
C

C static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your C code

  • All rules 315
  • Vulnerability13
  • Bug76
  • Security Hotspot19
  • Code Smell207

  • Quick Fix 19
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Hard-coded secrets are security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        2. "sprintf" should not be used

           Security Hotspot
        3. Changing working directories without verifying the success is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        4. Setting capabilities is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        5. Using "tmpnam", "tmpnam_s" or "tmpnam_r" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        6. Using "strncpy" or "wcsncpy" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        7. Using "strncat" or "wcsncat" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        8. Using "strcat" or "wcscat" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        9. Using "strlen" or "wcslen" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        10. Changing directories improperly when using "chroot" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        11. Using "strcpy" or "wcscpy" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        12. Using publicly writable directories is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        13. Using clear-text protocols is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        14. Expanding archive files without controlling resource consumption is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        15. Using weak hashing algorithms is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        16. Setting loose POSIX file permissions is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        17. Using pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        18. Hard-coded passwords are security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        19. Using hardcoded IP addresses is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot

        Using "strcpy" or "wcscpy" is security-sensitive

        consistency - conventional
        security
        Security Hotspot
        • cwe
        • cert

        In C, a string is just a buffer of characters, normally using the null character as a sentinel for the end of the string. This means that the developer has to be aware of low-level details such as buffer sizes or having an extra character to store the final null character. Doing that correctly and consistently is notoriously difficult and any error can lead to a security vulnerability, for instance, giving access to sensitive data or allowing arbitrary code execution.

        The function char *strcpy(char * restrict dest, const char * restrict src); copies characters from src to dest. The wcscpy does the same for wide characters and should be used with the same guidelines.

        Note: the functions strncpy and wcsncpy might look like attractive safe replacements for strcpy and wcscpy, but they have their own set of issues (see S5816), and you should probably prefer another more adapted alternative.

        Ask Yourself Whether

        • There is a possibility that either the source or the destination pointer is null
        • There is a possibility that the source string is not correctly null-terminated, or that its length (including the final null character) can be larger than the size of the destination buffer.
        • There is an overlap between source and destination

        There is a risk if you answered yes to any of those questions.

        Recommended Secure Coding Practices

        • C11 provides, in its annex K, the strcpy_s and the wcscpy_s that were designed as safer alternatives to strcpy and wcscpy. It’s not recommended to use them in all circumstances, because they introduce a runtime overhead and require to write more code for error handling, but they perform checks that will limit the consequences of calling the function with bad arguments.
        • Even if your compiler does not exactly support annex K, you probably have access to similar functions, for example, strlcpy in FreeBSD
        • If you are writing C++ code, using std::string to manipulate strings is much simpler and less error-prone

        Sensitive Code Example

        int f(char *src) {
          char dest[256];
          strcpy(dest, src); // Sensitive: might overflow
          return doSomethingWith(dest);
        }
        

        Compliant Solution

        int f(char *src) {
          char *dest = malloc(strlen(src) + 1); // For the final 0
          strcpy(dest, src); // Compliant: we made sure the buffer is large enough
          int r= doSomethingWith(dest);
          free(dest);
          return r;
        }
        

        See

        • OWASP - Top 10 2021 Category A6 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components
        • OWASP - Top 10 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities
        • CWE - CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
        • CERT, STR07-C. - Use the bounds-checking interfaces for string manipulation
        • STIG Viewer - Application Security and Development: V-222612 - The application must not be vulnerable to overflow attacks.
          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.1

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use